The patient sued both the surgeon individually and the hospital where the procedure was performed. However, after the hospital settled out of court the surgeon requested summary judgment based on his opinion that he had satisfied the standard of care by relying on information he received from the nurses. After a surgical procedure the circulating nurse and scrub nurse are responsible for accounting for all surgical materials. In this case they had told the surgeon that the sponges were all accounted for, at which point the surgeon proceeded to stitch the patient up.
Typically the plaintiff in an Illinois medical malpractice case has the burden to prove that the defendant doctor breached the standard of care, which is usually done by providing expert testimony. However, in Illinois expert testimony is not required to establish the relevant standard of care “where the common knowledge of laymen is sufficient to recognize or infer negligence.” Walski v. Tiesenga, 72 Ill.2d 249 (1978). In the present case the court held that medical expert testimony was not necessary because it is common knowledge that sponges should not be left behind in a patient after a surgery.
]]> However, the notion that the surgeon was careless is a rebuttable presumption. Yet there was no evidence presented by the plaintiff to counter the doctor’s testimony that he satisfied the standard of care. “Any inference of negligence based on the bare fact that a sponge was left inside plaintiff’s surgical wound was negated by unrefuted evidence,” said Justice Jack O’Malley, basically asserting that because plaintiff did not present any evidence as to how the surgeon was negligent they lost the opportunity to assert his negligence.Judge O’Malley further stated, that based “on this evidence, the ‘captain of the ship’ doctrine does not create a genuine issue of material fact.” The law in Illinois as to “captain of the ship” doctrine is that if a surgeon retains supervision or control over other persons participating in an operation, then he or she should be required to exercise and control the procedure with reasonable care. However, typically Illinois courts have held that a surgeon may not be liable for the nursing staff’s negligence without proof that the surgeon was independently negligent in relying on the nursing staff. Therefore, this doctrine does not apply in the present case.
Kreisman Law Offices has been handling Cook County medical malpractice cases for over 30 years, serving areas in and around Chicago including Naperville, Oak Park, Schaumburg, and Blue Island.
]]>
While the man was working for the IDOT the incident actually occurred in Indiana, just over the Illinois-Indian border. Because the injury took place in Indiana the defendant attorneys asked the 
Ms. Strong filed a Florida medical malpractice lawsuit against various physicians whom she alleged caused her injuries and resulting amputations. The physicians all seemed to agree that there were profound medical errors that caused Ms. Strong's injuries, but apportioned blame on each other.
Under the old requirement, any cause of action against the CTA had to submit a written notice to the CTA within six months of the relevant incident that advised the CTA of a potential cause of action. Failure to provide this notice barred the case from being brought. The formal notice required very specific facts regarding the action and essentially preserved the case for a later filing. 
Since 2007 
Starting in the 1990s insurance companies began taking advantage of baby boomers by scooping up thousands of individual long-term care insurance policies. It seems that the expectation by the insurance companies was that the buyers would eventually give up paying the annual premiums and close out the files by taking the collected premium. 
However, a recent settlement in a 
In order to increase the safety of its highways 
The lawsuit against Tyson alleged that the company had inflated the weight of its poultry products between 1997 and 2003. The claimants alleged that Tyson participated in a process of chilling the chickens which resulted in the absorption and retention of water under the poultry's skin and muscle tissues and thereby increased the bird's weight. 
I remember the first conversation I had with the decedent's husband, which took place shortly after her sudden death. During that conversation we discussed whether or not an autopsy should have been ordered. In my opinion whenever the cause of death seems unclear or suspicious it is wise to have an autopsy performed. However, in this case the woman's surviving family members opted not to get an autopsy done. 
Chicago and Illinois residents have reported symptoms of adverse affects from taking Hydroxycut, which range from stomach and abdominal pain, excessive fatigue, recurring headaches, excessive weakness, vomiting, loss of appetite, to kidney failure and liver damage severe enough to require a liver transplant. 
Because of the confusion that exists around who treating physicians and staff are actually working for, 
Over the last year, more than 3,000 trucking companies went out of business, which translates to about 7 out of every 100 trucks that were taken off of the road. And while economic analysts assure us that the economy is slowly recovering this trend is not apparent when we look at the frequent closing of trucking companies in Illinois, Chicago, and nationwide. 
After the new law goes into effect on July 1, 2009, state citizens can learn which doctors have been paid by manufacturers of brand-named drugs that they have been prescribing their patients, or how much money surgeons have received from the makers of stents, pacemakers, artificial knees, and other implant devices. The law is designed to provide a window into the considerable efforts and spending by device and drug makers to influence doctors.